Fenomena Gagal Bayar Pinjaman Online: Analisis Tanggung Jawab Para Pihak dalam Perspektif Hukum Perikatan

Main Article Content

πŸ‘€ Adhwa Fadhiyah
πŸ‘€ Rifa Aulia Ramadani
πŸ‘€ Putri Aulia Azahra

Abstract

The rapid development of financial technology (fintech), particularly peer-to-peer (P2P) lending services, has significantly reconfigured public access to financing through faster, more inclusive, and platform-based digital mechanisms. However, alongside this expansion, a structural issue has emerged in the form of the increasing incidence of loan defaults, which cannot merely be regarded as a debtor's breach of contract within the framework of conventional civil law. This study aims to examine the legal construction of the relationships among the parties involved in online lending services and to analyze the distribution of legal responsibility among lenders, borrowers, and platform operators from the perspective of the law of obligations. This research employs a normative legal research method using both the statutory approach and the conceptual approach, supported by descriptive-qualitative analysis of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The findings reveal that legal relationships in fintech lending are not merely bilateral but instead constitute a tripartite legal framework that requires a reassessment of the conventional concept of breach of contract. Platform operators cannot be viewed solely as administrative intermediaries; rather, they bear normative responsibilities relating to the principles of prudence, information transparency, and systemic risk management, while lenders and borrowers remain bound by the contractual obligations established under the law of obligations. Furthermore, existing academic studies have primarily focused on consumer protection and regulatory aspects, leaving the distribution of legal responsibilities among the parties insufficiently explored. This study concludes that a conceptual reconstruction of legal relationships in fintech lending is necessary to provide a more balanced framework of legal certainty in addressing loan default cases in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Fenomena Gagal Bayar Pinjaman Online: Analisis Tanggung Jawab Para Pihak dalam Perspektif Hukum Perikatan. (2026). Ar-Rasyid: Jurnal Publikasi Penelitian Ilmiah, 2(7), 53-71. https://doi.org/10.64788/ar-rasyid.v2i7.426

References

(OJK)., O. J. K. (2016). FAQ: KATEGORI UMUM. 1.

Arner, D. W., Barberis, J., & Buckley, R. P. (2017). FinTech , RegTech , and the Reconceptualization of Financial Regulation. 37(3).

Dirgantara, U., & Suryadama, M. (2026). Pertanggungjawaban Penyelenggara Fintech Peer-To-Peer Lending Terhadap Risiko Gagal Bayar Lender. 943–954.

Fuady, M. (2014). Konsep Hukum Perdata. PT RajaGrafindo Persada. https://rajagrafindo.co.id/produk/konsep-hukum-perdata/

HUDANI, S. A. (2024). TANGGUNG JAWAB PERUSAHAAN FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY (FINTECH) TERHADAP KESALAHAN TRANSAKSI DALAM PEER TO PEER LENDING. 1–23.

Hukum, J., & Justitia, C. (2026). TANGGUNG JAWAB DAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KREDITUR DALAM KASUS WANPRESTASI UTANG PIUTANG. 6(1), 1–12.

Mauren, M. (2024). Tanggung Jawab Hukum Fintech P2P Lending Ketika Debitor Gagal Bayar. 27 September. https://www.marietamauren.id/news/tanggung-jawab-hukum-fintech-p2p-lending-ketika-debitor-gagal-bayar

Nugroho, H. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Para Pihak dalam Transaksi Pinjaman Online. Jurnal Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora.

Prof. Dr. Peter Mahmud Marzuki, S.H., M.S., L. M. (2021). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=CKZADwAAQBAJ&printsec=copyright#v=onepage&q&f=false

Salsabila, A. N. (n.d.). Tanggung Jawab Debitur yang Melakukan Wanprestasi terhadap Kreditur dalam Kasus Kredit Macet.

Syahrani, R., Subekti, R., Pokok, P., & Perdata, H. (2009). No Title.

Tim Publikasi Hukumonline. (2024). Debitur Gagal Bayar, Dapatkah Fintech P2P Lending Bertanggung Jawab? 26 September.

Wasti Emma Mandacan, Dientje Rumimpunu, F. T. (2019). AKIBAT HUKUM DARI WANPRESTASI DALAM KONTRAK PERJANJIAN HUKUM PERDATA INDONESIA.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.